The people of India.
In Hindu temples in India, women are still not allowed to enter.
India's Supreme Court has granted admission to women from the age group of 10 to 50 years in the Sabarimala temple of about eight hundred years old. The ancient belief that women of that age are seasoned, on the other hand, the goddess god Ayappa is a Brahmachari, as a result of which she can become rude if she is women near the goddess of eternal life.
That is why, in the Periyar Tiger Project, women in the 10 to 50-year-old women were not allowed to enter the temple situated on a hill.
But apart from that temple, there are other temples in India where women do not have access.
It is known that the world's richest temple, Sri Padmanabhaswamy temple in Kerala, or the Trimmkeshwar temple in Maharashtra, Kartikeya temple in Pushkar in Rajasthan, Mahalaxmi temple in Kolhapur in Maharashtra, or Mallikarjuneswami temple of Tallawadir in Tamilnadu.
Again there are some temples where men cannot enter. For example, the Kamakhya Temple near Visakhapatnam is not accessible to men on certain special days of the month. Married men cannot go to Pushkar's god Brahma temple. Kanyakumari's goddess Kanyakumari cannot enter the temple or married men.
In the temples which are not accessible to women, they are basically worshiped as Brahmachari or evergreen. Like the worshiper of Ayurveda, the goddess of Ayurveda, Brahmachari and the eternal, so many millions of people who meet the special puja on the day of Makar Sankranti, have to observe Brahmacharya for 41 days before Puja. They eat vegetarian food, wear black clothes, do not cut their beards, and do not associate with any women.
Eventually, there is a temple near Ayappa temple, where there is a puja of a god named Malaapuratathama. Many people believe that Malappuram wanted to marry Ayappa, but it was not possible because Ayappa was a Brahmachari. So Malikuratmama is waiting for the Ayappa temple near here.
Another close friendship with Ayappa was the name of a Muslim named Bhavar. Therefore, an important part of that temple is that Durga.
The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that this temple has changed women's rules for several centuries.
But many women do not want themselves to enter the temple after the ritual.
Smita Menon runs a public relations agency in Kochi city
He said to BBC Bangla, "No malware women will want to break the rule of adoration and enter the temple as much as the Supreme Court decides on the verdict, it is our belief that there is no joining of the rituals, that temple is actually Brahmacharya Pithan. Before going there, all the worldly things Men keep away, and we help the husband or father all at that time. So Brahmacharya celebrations We do not want to spoil the romance. "
Earlier in the temple named Shinganpur that was not allowed to enter the temple, or in Trishankeshwar temple of Nasik, where women are still not allowed to enter the womb, in most cases the ban comes due to the physiological process of women - it is sometimes argued that it is associated with reproduction or menstrual cycle. Since then
Bharatpur Brigade, an organization in Maharashtra, has been fighting for a long time with women's access to Hindu temples.
The organization's chief, Tritta Desai, told BBC Bangla, "There is no scientific reasoning to be menstruated with these sanctions, it is a discrimination against women. In the twenty-first century, when girls run fighter, rule the country, go into space, they can not enter the temple at that time. No. They also have the right to worship. "
The Supreme Court also said that the menstruating women do not enter the Sarimala temple, meaning their interference in the religion of their religion.
However, Hindu mythology expert Nrusingh Prasad Bhaduri said that there should be no conflict with these rules with Puranas.
"The scripture was created from that society, then it was a compilation of the rules which were in the society at that time, that society was governed in the same way, at that time if the society is from the manhood, then it is not necessary to obey in the current era. There are laws, so now that society will run according to the modern laws, so there is no conflict between the two. No, "said Professor Bhaduri.
His explanation, because there is a continuity of society in the ancient times, there is no such thing that standing and presenting it should be judged well.
Incidentally, the five-member bench of the Supreme Court gave women access to the Sarimala temple, the only woman judge Indu Malhotra wrote the minority verdict. According to him, the court should not interfere with religion.
Follow More
Follow us Facebook:
India's Supreme Court has granted admission to women from the age group of 10 to 50 years in the Sabarimala temple of about eight hundred years old. The ancient belief that women of that age are seasoned, on the other hand, the goddess god Ayappa is a Brahmachari, as a result of which she can become rude if she is women near the goddess of eternal life.
But apart from that temple, there are other temples in India where women do not have access.
It is known that the world's richest temple, Sri Padmanabhaswamy temple in Kerala, or the Trimmkeshwar temple in Maharashtra, Kartikeya temple in Pushkar in Rajasthan, Mahalaxmi temple in Kolhapur in Maharashtra, or Mallikarjuneswami temple of Tallawadir in Tamilnadu.
Again there are some temples where men cannot enter. For example, the Kamakhya Temple near Visakhapatnam is not accessible to men on certain special days of the month. Married men cannot go to Pushkar's god Brahma temple. Kanyakumari's goddess Kanyakumari cannot enter the temple or married men.
In the temples which are not accessible to women, they are basically worshiped as Brahmachari or evergreen. Like the worshiper of Ayurveda, the goddess of Ayurveda, Brahmachari and the eternal, so many millions of people who meet the special puja on the day of Makar Sankranti, have to observe Brahmacharya for 41 days before Puja. They eat vegetarian food, wear black clothes, do not cut their beards, and do not associate with any women.
Eventually, there is a temple near Ayappa temple, where there is a puja of a god named Malaapuratathama. Many people believe that Malappuram wanted to marry Ayappa, but it was not possible because Ayappa was a Brahmachari. So Malikuratmama is waiting for the Ayappa temple near here.
Another close friendship with Ayappa was the name of a Muslim named Bhavar. Therefore, an important part of that temple is that Durga.
The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that this temple has changed women's rules for several centuries.
But many women do not want themselves to enter the temple after the ritual.
Smita Menon runs a public relations agency in Kochi city
He said to BBC Bangla, "No malware women will want to break the rule of adoration and enter the temple as much as the Supreme Court decides on the verdict, it is our belief that there is no joining of the rituals, that temple is actually Brahmacharya Pithan. Before going there, all the worldly things Men keep away, and we help the husband or father all at that time. So Brahmacharya celebrations We do not want to spoil the romance. "
Earlier in the temple named Shinganpur that was not allowed to enter the temple, or in Trishankeshwar temple of Nasik, where women are still not allowed to enter the womb, in most cases the ban comes due to the physiological process of women - it is sometimes argued that it is associated with reproduction or menstrual cycle. Since then
Bharatpur Brigade, an organization in Maharashtra, has been fighting for a long time with women's access to Hindu temples.
The organization's chief, Tritta Desai, told BBC Bangla, "There is no scientific reasoning to be menstruated with these sanctions, it is a discrimination against women. In the twenty-first century, when girls run fighter, rule the country, go into space, they can not enter the temple at that time. No. They also have the right to worship. "
The Supreme Court also said that the menstruating women do not enter the Sarimala temple, meaning their interference in the religion of their religion.
However, Hindu mythology expert Nrusingh Prasad Bhaduri said that there should be no conflict with these rules with Puranas.
"The scripture was created from that society, then it was a compilation of the rules which were in the society at that time, that society was governed in the same way, at that time if the society is from the manhood, then it is not necessary to obey in the current era. There are laws, so now that society will run according to the modern laws, so there is no conflict between the two. No, "said Professor Bhaduri.
His explanation, because there is a continuity of society in the ancient times, there is no such thing that standing and presenting it should be judged well.
Incidentally, the five-member bench of the Supreme Court gave women access to the Sarimala temple, the only woman judge Indu Malhotra wrote the minority verdict. According to him, the court should not interfere with religion.
Follow More
Follow us Facebook:
No comments